Transfer
Charges collected by Developers for transfer of rights of purchasing a flat are
outside the ambit of service tax and not taxable under Real Estate Agent
Service. (M/s Ansal Housing &
Construction Vs Commissioner of Service Tax)
----------------------------------------
Foreign investment in NBFC Sector under 100%
Foreign Direct
Investment (FDI) route does cover operating leases.
----------------------------------------
Cost audit
report in XBRL taxonomy
Companies are required to file cost audit reports
(Form-I) and compliance report (Form A) for the financial year 2011-12 onwards
(including the overdue reports relating to any previous year) by using XRBL
taxonomy. As taxonomy is expected to be notified by 30th June 2012,
these reports would be filed after 30th June 2012.
----------------------------------------
DCIT Vs. Mastek Limited (ITAT
Ahemdabad)
Whether foreign
income-tax is deductible u/s 37(1). Bar in s. 40(a)(ii) does not apply to
foreign taxes
The
assessee paid Rs.42.57 lakhs in Belgium as income-tax and claimed that as
deduction u/s 37(1). The AO rejected the claim by relying on s, 40(a)(ii) which
provides that any sum paid on account of tax levied on profits or gains of
business shall not be allowable as a deduction, though the CIT (A) allowed
the claim on the ground that the bar in s. 40(a)(ii) did not apply to foreign
taxes. On appeal by the department, HELD dismissing the appeal
Held
the term “tax”
is defined in s. 2(43) to mean income-tax chargeable under the provisions of
this Act. S. 37(1) allows a deduction of all taxes and rates. Taxes levied in
foreign countries whether on profits or gains or otherwise are deductible u/s
37(1) not hit by s. 40(a)(ii). It is also not application of income. The same
view has been taken by ITAT Mumbai in South East Asia Shipping Co
& Tata Sons Ltd.
----------------------------------------
Amendment
in Accounting Standard 11 of the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006
by MCA
In respect of accounting periods commencing on
or after the 1st April, 2011, for an enterprise which had earlier exercised the
option under paragraph 46 the exchange differences arising on reporting of
long-term foreign currency monetary items, in so far as they relate to the
acquisition of a depreciable capital assets, can be added to or deducted from
the cost of the assets and shall be depreciated over the balance life of the assets,
and in other cases, can be accumulated in a "Foreign Currency Monetary
Item Translation Difference Account" in the enterprise's financial
statements and amortized over the balance period of such long term assets or liability,
by recognition as income or expense in each of such periods, with the exception
of exchange differences dealt with in accordance with the provisions of
paragraph 15 of the said rules.
Provided that the option exercised by the
enterprise shall disclose the fact of such option and of the amount remaining
to be amortized in the financial statements of the period in which such option
is exercised and in every subsequent period so long as any exchange difference
remains unamortized."
---------------------------------------
“As per the recent Notification, EPFO(PF Department) is
introducing Electronic Challan cum Return (ECR) from April, 2012 for remittance
of contributions by all employers...., Employers/Authorized Signatory are
required to file the ECR for wage month of March 2012 (payable in April 2012)
onwards....”
----------------------------------------
Breeze
Constructions (P.) Ltd. Versus Income-tax Officer, Ward 3(1)
Disallowance
interest expenses holding that the assessee has not commenced its business
Held
that:- As per provision of section 36(1)(iii) interest paid, in respect of capital borrowed for acquisition of an
asset for extension of existing business
or profession; for any period beginning from the date on which the capital was borrowed for acquisition of the
asset till the date on which such asset
was first put to use, shall not be allowed as deduction. By implication this proviso is also applicable
when assets are acquired for new business
- against assessee.
Disallowance
administrative and other expense by holding that the assessee has not commenced
its business
Held
that:- Merely taking land on lease, by any stretch of imagination cannot be
treated as the commencement / setting up of it's hotel business - against
assessee.
----------------------------------------
Tata Autocomp Systems Ltd. Vs ACIT [ITAT (Mumbai)]
- Lending or borrowing money
between two associated enterprises comes within the ambit of international
transaction and whether the same is at arm's length price has to be considered.
The question of rate of interest on the borrowings is an integral part of arm's
length price determination in this context
- Once the transaction between the assessee and the Associated
Enterprises is in foreign currency and the transaction is an international
transaction, then the transaction would have to be looked upon by applying the
commercial principles in regard to international transaction. If this is so,
then the domestic prime lending rate would have no applicability and the
international rate fixed being LIBOR would come into play.
----------------------------------------
TDS on interest payable to
foreign company on external commercial borrowings
The newly introduced Section 194LC of the Income-tax
Act, 1961 (the Act) prescribes a specified Indian company to deduct tax on
interest payable to a foreign company at the rate of 5 per cent. The Amended Bill has widened the meaning of
term “monies borrowed” to include monies borrowed by the Indian company at any
time between 1 July 2012 to 1 July 2015, in foreign currency from a source
outside India even by way of issue of long term infrastructure bonds. Further, the Amended Bill has extended these
provisions to all Indian companies rather than restricting it to only specified
8 companies under the Bill.
----------------------------------------
In order to arrest declining
value of rupee, RBI has issued a circular for an immediate implementation as
follows: -
- For all forex earnings eligibility towards
retaining foreign currency to EEFC accounts has been reduced to a maximum
permissible limit of 50%. The balance
50% shall have to be converted to Rupee accounts maintained by the clients.
- Existing balances held in EEFC
accounts should be converted forthwith into rupee balances and credited to
rupee accounts within next 15 days.
----------------------------------------
Treatment of capital expenditure on assets not owned by the
company
Under the Opinion by the Expert Advisory Committee (EAC) of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) clarified that costs associated
with enabling assets, such as construction of connecting roads, electricity
transmission lines, etc., the ownership of which does not pass to the company,
do not qualify for being capitalised as Capital Work in Progress even during
the construction period. Instead, the EAC opined that the amount spent on
enabling assets should be expensed off in the period when these are incurred.
The EAC explained, since the control does not pass to the company
such enabling assets do not meet the definition of ‘asset’ as defined in the Framework
for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements as issued by the
ICAI. Thus these cannot be capitalised even though such enabling assets will
provide future economic benefits to the company. The EAC also relied on the
guidance provided in AS 26, Intangible Assets, which mentions that where
an expenditure is incurred to provide future economic benefits but no asset,
intangible or otherwise can be created, such expenditure needs to be expensed
off when incurred.
----------------------------------------
Living
allowance exempt from tax, if paid to employees of Indian company who are
temporarily deployed in US to work for Indian Company
The Kolkata Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has held
that, living allowance paid in addition to the regular salaries and benefits in
India to the employees of Indian Company who are temporarily deployed in US
will be exempt from tax. Thus the living
allowance would not be covered by section 17(2) of the Act. Exemption under section 10(14)(i) of the Act
would be available.
This is an important ruling by the Honourable ITAT,
which highlights the principle that duration of posting is a relevant consideration
in deciding whether the person has been sent on tour or transfer, but it cannot
be considered as a conclusive factor. Further,
the factors such as transfer of payroll, nature of service provided, relation
with the entity transferred to, visa travelled on, location of family, etc also
needs to be analysed in detail. Further,
it is also important for the taxpayer to justify its claim of living allowance
under Section 10(14) of the Act read with Rule 2BB of the Rules by proper
documentation of the amount spent towards ordinarily daily living charges on
account of absence from normal place of duty.
----------------------------------------
Clarification on rate of service tax (Circular No. 158/9/ 2012 – ST dated 08-05-2012)
In respect of 8 specified
services provided by individual, proprietorship or partnership concern on which
service tax liability was payable on payment basis upto 31-03-2012 and services
on which tax is paid under reverse charge -
Invoice raised before 01-04-2012 and payment received / made on or after
01-04-2012
- Rate of Service tax shall be
12.36%.
- Supplementary invoice to be
issued reflecting new rate of tax & recover differential amount.
- In case of reverse charge, CENVAT Credit can be availed on the basis of such
supplementary invoice & tax payment challans ----------------------------------------
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs
Central Warehousing Corporation Income Tax Appeal (999/2011 & 1091/2011)
High Court of Delhi Dated 30th April 2012
Issue
Whether Penalty can be imposed on
the assessee where additions are made under the normal provisions of the
Act but actually the taxable income of the assessee is assessed not under the
normal provisions but under Section 115JB and there is no addition as far as
book profits is concerned.
Held
No doubt, there was
concealment but that had its repercussions only when the assessment was done
under the normal procedure. The assessment as per the normal procedure was,
however, not acted upon. On the contrary, it is the deemed income assessed
under section 115JB of the Act which has become the basis of assessment as it
was higher of the two. Tax is thus paid on the income assessed under section
115JB of the Act. Hence, when the computation was made under section 115JB of
the Act, the aforesaid concealment had no role to play and was totally
irrelevant. Therefore, the concealment did not lead to tax evasion at
all.
----------------------------------------
Transfer of Funds allowed from Non-Resident
Ordinary (NRO) Account to Non-Resident External (NRE) Account within the
overall ceiling of USD one million per financial year by NRI
----------------------------------------
Post Budget Updates
- Deferment of implementation of General Anti-Avoidance
Rules or GAAR till 2013.
- Roll back of excise levy on all branded and unbranded
jewellery
- TDS on sale of immovable Property has been
withdrawn----------------------------------------
Big relief to PPP companies
Ministry of Corporate affairs
(MCA) has issued notification to clarify the long debatable issue in relation
to amortization of the Intangible asset created under BOT (Build, Operate &
Transfer), BOOT (Build, Own, Operate & Transfer) or any other form of PPP
(Public Private Partnership).
New heading inserted in schedule
XIV of the Companies Act, 1956 clarifies that amortization of Intangible asset
recognized pursuant to above agreements will be proportionate (actual revenue
for the year/total projected revenue from the Intangible asset) of the cost.
This method of amortization will further strengthen matching concept of
accounting. Amortization formula as well as example has been given by the
Ministry to avoid confusions.
----------------------------------------
One time relaxation in timeline for submission of Annual Audited
Financial Results for listed entities
Considering difficulties faced in
submission of annual financial results along with Q4 results and first time
adoption of the revised Schedule VI to the Companies Act 1956, SEBI has given
relaxation in timeline for submission of annual audited financial results in
respect of the last quarter of FY 2011-12 and annual audited results for FY
2011-12. Listed entities will have an
option to either:
- Submit limited reviewed results for the last quarter (Q4)
within 45 days from end of the quarter followed by submission of annual audited
results as soon as they are approved by the Board of Directors or
- Submit annual audited results within 60 days from the end
of 4th quarter along with results for the last quarter (Q4) which would be a
balancing figure.
----------------------------------------
Amendment to clause 41 of the equity listing agreement
Formats
for financial results has been amended to be in line with format under revised
Schedule VI of the Companies Act, 1956----------------------------------------
Borrower to provide bifurcation of utilisation of the
ECB proceeds towards foreign currency and Rupee expenditure at the time of
availing Loan Registration Number (LRN) from the Reserve Bank of India.
Further borrower should ensure that ECB proceeds
meant for rupee expenditure in India are repatriated to India for credit to
Rupee account only.
----------------------------------------